Johnson & Johnson Recalls and Removes Talc-Based Baby Powder

Many people have been shocked to learn that J&J voluntarily recalled 33,000 bottles of talc-based baby powder after testing showed the presence of asbestos in the product. While the company has backed off from a full recall, environmental groups are calling on Congress to require warning labels on talc-based baby powder products. But what are the alternatives? Here are a few alternatives to avoid.

The company has blamed shoddy science, inaccurate testing, and unprepared researchers for the problems. Thousands of consumers have filed complaints about talc-based baby powder, claiming that the company failed to warn them about the risks. Even though the company has withdrawn its talc-based baby powder, it says it will fight the lawsuit and defend the product vigorously in court. As the company evaluates its product portfolio, the company is considering whether or not to remove its talc-based baby powder products altogether.

Although Johnson & J has been involved in dozens of lawsuits in recent years, many of them have been settled out of court. Several of the cases against the company have resulted in $172 million in judgments. One case has even been linked to ovarian cancer in a woman who claimed to have developed the disease after using J&J products. In the end, it is the consumers who will decide whether or not to switch to another brand.

The company has been working to calm concerns about the talc-based baby powder. As the first company to voluntarily recall and remove talc-based baby powder, J&J has been working to remove the product from the market. As the company seeks to expand its market, it has decided to introduce a cornstarch-based version of its popular baby powder. However, it is also facing a lawsuit due to the discovery of asbestos in its baby powder. Click Here Johnson & Johnson Recalls and Removes Talc-Based Baby Powder

The lawsuit was filed after a Dartmouth College professor found asbestos fibers in J&J talc products. The company failed to disclose the findings to the FDA. The company did not tell the agency that the testing that they did revealed asbestos. However, a lab at J&J later tested five of 17 samples of talc and found asbestos fibers. Despite the recent lawsuits, the company will continue to sell talc-based baby powder in other countries.

As asbestos continues to be regulated by the federal and state governments, J&J is still using talc in its products. As a result, J&J could not guarantee that its Baby Powder was asbestos-free when plaintiffs used it. In addition to the lawsuit, the company also rejected citizen-driven requests for a cosmetic talc warning label. The FDA rejected the citizen request for a cosmetic talc warning label, saying that prolonged exposure to talc in baby powder would not increase the risk of cancer.

Since talc is similar to asbestos, there have been many lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson. The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, or ADAO, called for the recall. Although the company did not find a statistically significant link between talc and ovarian cancer, the association is still being investigated. Black women's health has been impacted by this issue.